Armored Cavalry units had an interesting table of organization that pushed combined arms. These units were designed to hit hard, and a look at a troop (company-level asset) TO&E shows that they brought a lot of firepower to battle. Each troop consisted of a headquarters section, two scout platoons, two tank platoons, a maintenance section, and a mortar section. Let’s break it down and then we’ll provide commentary.
- Headquarters Section:
- One M1A1 Abrams
- One M3A2 Bradley
- One M577 Command post
- Three HMMWVs
- One 5-ton truck with water tank trailer
- Two Scout Platoons:
- Six M3A2 Bradleys (each)
- Two Tank Platoons:
- Four M1A1 Abrams (each)
- Troop Maintenance Section (18 men):
- One M88A2 armored recovery vehicle
- One M113A3 APC
- Two 5-ton trucks with cargo trailers
- Mortar Section
- Two M106 mortar carriers
Some variation in utility vehicles can be found in tables depending on era. My primary source is Tom Clancy’s Armored Cav which is regrettably light on the details of support units in an early-90s troop.
The first thing to note is that there’s not a lot of infantry here. The M3-series Bradleys have only two dismounts a piece, which gives the troop only 24 dismountable soldiers. On the other hand, the M3s have twice the stowed ammo of an M2, so they bring lots of firepower to the table. This is also one of the few places where a platoon with six subelements (namely the M3s) can be found in an official table.
The troop also brings some form of all three elements of combined arms: infantry, armor, and artillery (the mortars). I really like that. Would that it had more infantry though. It wouldn’t be too hard to replace the scout platoons for conventional mechanized infantry platoons. While I’m talking changes, I’d prefer to replace the M106s with some sort of turreted mortar carrier like the Rak.
I’m also curious how a mechanized infantry platoon might work if it had six IFVs in it. I would probably assume a nominal organization where a “squad” is the IFV and it’s dismount team. But there are other thoughts; the US army has indicated a desire to go this way in the future with the dismounts grouping into larger squads after disembarking.
Overall though, I really like the core concept here. As always, pushing more differing vehicle types to lower levels pushes more logistics and maintenance requirements lower as well. The US Army was able to make it work, at least as long as a plausible serious threat was present. I’ll probably shamelessly crib from this all the same.
I guess big Army doesn’t care for Armored Cav – the below FM isn’t listed on the active pub list. (well, they did turn 3rd ACR into a Striker Reg… so yeah…)
Pingback: The Armored Cavalry Squadron | The Soapbox